Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Rupert and Hillary, sitting in a tree?

....raping out country even more than it has already happened.

Yes, in the news today, the dreaded Rupert Murdoch is revealed as a big ol fan of Hillary Clinton. Now, if this doesn't make you think about the falsehoods of our 'two party system' then you need to do some research. There are no two parties. There is simply classes. The ruling class, and the manipulated. You, my friends, are among the manipulated.

The ruling class forces you to align yourself with only 2 choices. Democrat, and Republican. Interesting that we supposedly live in a 'democracy' and not a 'republic.' Regardless, these 2 'parties' are a sham. Its like watching wrestling. These are simply actors playing on your morals and values, convincing you to join one side or the other. Yet there are so many different issues that people have their own opinions on. What if you are a Democrat who supports the Death Penalty, or opposes abortion? You don't want to become a republican, do you? How do you vote in a presidential election. We all know at this point its thinking of the lesser of two evils.

lets reflect on that. The lesser of 2 evils indeed. It is one evil, and 2 puppets. Both puppets have the same master, yet portray themselves as opposed. This is not working.

And think about individual issues. Think about the electoral college. What are you voting for? Do you actually vote on an issue, or simply vote in a puppet who may or may not choose your side. Our 'representatives' do not represent us.

The smokescreen is growing more and more thin. Whether they are not trying as hard, or they just can't keep it up.

The time to decide what happens to us, and to our future, is now. The time to choose whether you are one of the manipulated, one of the ruling class, or, here's a concept, choose a third option.

It is time for a third option.

14 Comments:

At 3:35 PM, Blogger Cash said...

This is why people should vote for me. I have a completely different program from anyone. Without saying too much, it involves people being smashed under my iron fist. Well, not fist, paw.
LONG LIVE THE REVOLUTION!

 
At 7:49 PM, Blogger Dr. R. Murk said...

I'd like to be smashed... on BOOZE! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 
At 9:52 PM, Blogger Joey Polanski said...

Problem wit de ol "third option" is that evry muddl-heddid pergressives got a diffrent third option -- so th net rsult is that non-pergressive cannidates win lanslide vickterys.

Anyone who says theres no diffrence btween Dems an Reps has got is head up is ass. You want th "rulin class" t take a hit in th ass, vote th Reps OUT -- wich means ya GOTTA vote fer th only ones wit a REALISTICK shot at it.

Pie-in-th-sky radickle idealists votin 3rd party dlights Republickans. Absalutely dlights em.

-- Franky Delano Polanskivelt

 
At 7:28 AM, Blogger Hobbs von Wackamole said...

Joey, i don't disagree with you.
we are stuck in this system, so, while working outside of it, we still have to play ball. and that means voting the Reps out, by voting democrat.
but, what we also need to be doing is smashing the sytem, so that the false choice is gone.
there are genuine people out there in the govt. just few of them. i for one am going Deval Patrick for Mass Governor, cuz i think he's a real one. He'll do what we want.
But Hillary? That'll be terrible.
she's no Dem, she just plays one on TV.
its ok. the destruction is coming.

 
At 8:47 AM, Blogger Joey Polanski said...

In a genral elecktion tween Hillary an any Republickan, Id vote Hillary ... cause any vote fer a independent woud effecktively be a vote fer the Republickan.

But I DONT support Hillary fer the Dem nom. I wish Joey Biden woud finely get off his ass an make a serious atempt t get some national tracktion. He said hes runnin, an hed have MY spport ALL TH WAY. But pretty soon th national buzz will be ALL HILLARY ALL TH TIME, an then Biden will say (once again) that he has no hope of raisin sfficient funds.

 
At 8:57 AM, Blogger Joey Polanski said...

If we can vote Dems in, we can move th party in a bettr drecktion.

The secrit werd o th day is "incrementalism". As I said, them jump-straigt-to-perfecktion idealist pergressives ONLY HELP TH NON-PERGRESSIVES GET ELECKTED.

Thats why Im one o them "Blue Dog Democrats": Id vote fer a ol blue dog, if it was runnin as a Dem. "Votin fer th real deal / genuin artickle" always souns good in th abstrackt -- an I done that bfore (votin third party). But ya gotta see th big pitchr; an doin that is IRRSPONSIBLE, when it can reasonbly be xpeckted t eleckt Rpublicans.

 
At 9:24 AM, Blogger Hobbs von Wackamole said...

I hear you Joey!
Luckily, i live in a state that always votes democrat, so I am able to, say, vote for Nader in 2000 without fear of wasting my vote. I used it as a statement. Now, if voting actually worked, and it was the popular vote, not this electoral college bullshit, then i wouldn't have voted Nader (I voted Kerry in 04, because Bush is a monster). But there seems no such thing as a popular vote.

Check my post on the voting machines. I'm starting to doubt if voting even works at all. Seems a sham!

 
At 9:25 AM, Blogger Hobbs von Wackamole said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 10:35 AM, Blogger AngryMan said...

I'm worried that Biden might plagarize his campaign speeches again...

 
At 3:38 PM, Blogger Joey Polanski said...

AngryMan: Heck, I guy who jus been accusd recently o plagiarizin Joey Polanski ought not t be castin no stones at Joey Biden.

Hobbs: Id spport doin away wit da elecktoral collidge; but th years of dcline in th intellecktual aptitude of th avrage votr have probly made fer a more favrable climate for NON-pergressive "God Hates Fags"-style cannidates in "popular" contests.

If you live in one o th BLUEST states, Hobbs, I live in one o th REDDEST! We pracktickly have UNABOMBR as an official state office where Im at! An I remembr in 2000 a significkant campain to get pergressives t vote Nadr, on th grouns that Gore had no chance in th state an 5% fer th Greens woud strenthen th Green Party in th state. It made a kinda sense; BUT YA GOTTA BE CAREFUL BOUT BUYIN INTA THAT KINDA THINKIN. I also happm t live in one of only 2 states that aint "winnr-take-all" rgardin elecktoral votes. If them forces pushin fer th Nadr vote wouda concentratd on spportin GORE in 2000 in th 2 "urban" districkts in th state, Bush mite NEVR a been elecktd! Also, fer Congress, Im in a psition of havin t vote fer Democrats that are NO DIFFRENT from Rpublickans. Them are th only ones that can get elecktd here. So why dont I vote 3rd party in them? Cause what Im really votin fer is Harry Reid as Senate mjority leadr and Nancy Plosi as Speaker of th House.

My main point is this: Th left is far too prone to alow a "theoretickle" idealism lead pracktickly to cakewalk elecktions of Rpublicans.

THATS why Im a BLUE DOG DEMOCRAT.

 
At 5:51 PM, Blogger Dr. R. Murk said...

So, this is why Joey has stopped talking to me... he's a period loving liberal!!!

 
At 4:55 PM, Blogger Joey Polanski said...

If Librals love periods, Doc, what do Cnservatives love? Lemme gess: colons.

 
At 9:28 AM, Blogger Dr. R. Murk said...

No, priests love colons. Conservatives love back slashes.

 
At 10:20 PM, Blogger Joey Polanski said...

Black slashs?

Oh ... BACK slashs!

How dya feel bout BLACK back slashs?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home